X which is Hausdorff and x
y
A then
U, V in X separating x and y.
U and A
V are open in the subspace topology on A and separate x, y.
(x2 , y2 ) in X
Y, either x1
y1 or x2
y2. Suppose the former. Then
U, V in X separating x1 and x2 and then U
Y and V
Y separate (x1 , y1 ) and (x2 , y2 ).

R / Q) shows that it doesn't.
) and those made using these.
, a) and those made by combining them, Hence the only extra ones are open as well and so the separation cannot be done.
y, if {y} is closed we have X - {y} is an open set containing x but not y. Hence X is T1.
{ Uy | y
x } = X - {x} and so {x} is closed.
Y to X and pY : X
Y
Y map open sets to open sets and closed sets to closed sets.
Y its images in X and Y are both clopen and hence the whole of X and Y. Hence U = X
Y.
{a, b} is not constant then the open sets f -1({a}) and f -1({b}) would disconnect X.
A or V
A would be the whole of A. Say A
U (which is a closed set). Hence cl(A)
U and U, V would not be a disconnection.
If C is a component, then C = cl(C) and so C is closed.
Take X to be a (closed) "filled in" figure 8. Taking the interior removes the "crossing point" and so the interior is disconnected.
, a)
[a,
) and so is disconnected. Its components are singleton sets since if x
y we can take a between them and disconnect them by sets like those above.
(i) In the cofinite topology R is connected since the only proper closed subsets are finite ones.
(ii) Similarly, R is connected in the co-countable topology.
is reflexive and symmetric. Use the fact that A
B is connected if A and B are and A
B
to prove transitivity. [The equivalence classes are the components.]
Again it is clear that
is symmetric and reflexive. To prove transitivity, take a path
connecting p and q and a path
connecting q and r and make a new path
by
(t) =
(2t) if 0
t
1/2 and
(2t-1) otherwise.. Then
connects p and r.
Since a path (which is the continuous image of the connected interval) is connected it follows that pathwise connected
connected