Previous page (Limits of functions) | Contents | Next page (Some horrible functions) |
Informally: Close points (δ apart) are mapped to close points (ε apart).
We formalise this to get the following:
Definition
Secondly, we show that the sequential definition implies the ε-δ one.
Given ε > 0, suppose that we could not find a suitable δ. Then δ = 1 would not work and so we must have some x1 such that |x1- p| < 1 and |f (x1) - f (p)| > ε.
Similarly, δ = 1/2will not work, and so we can find x2 further down the sequence than x1 such that |x2- p| < 1/2 and |f (x2) - f (p)| > ε.
Continuing in this way we get a sequence (x1, x2, x3, ... ) which by construction converges to p, but for which f (xn) is always at least ε away from f (p). So we cannot have (f (xn)) converging to f (p) and we have a contradiction.
Proof
Given ε > 0 we must show that |√x - √p| < ε provided that x, p are close enough.
Now |√x - √p| = |x - p|/|√x + √p| < |x - p| /√p and so choosing δ = ε/√p will do.
Previous page (Limits of functions) | Contents | Next page (Some horrible functions) |